varleym wrote:Nick
I'm lifting mine. I've still got the old standard springs, all de-rusted and painted up, if you want them.
Cheers
Mark
oh, that would be lovely - thank you very much.
are you going to briercliffe? If so could i pinch them off you then?
As for why i;m going back to standard height... i just dont see the benefits of an additional 2" to the chassis rails and rear crosmember on a 90. I have yet to get completely stuck on an obstacle by high centering it or wedging the back end on something. Or should i say, i HAVE been stuck like that, but being 2" higher would have made no difference in those situations.
I only run standard sized tyres and therefore have no body fouling issues and running 2" higher means you put more stress on the prop UJs, drop arm ball joint, panhard rod bushes (both running higher angles) which in turn gives you a bit of bump steer. Plus running a lift gives you more body roll. Castor angle is also affected, although on my 90 it has been minimal although some people report horrible steering after a lift.
Getting the spring rates right so you can still compress each corner to the original bumpstops whilst giving a 2" lift means you end up with soft and long springs. again compromising handling on the road.
Just aint worth the hassle i reckon.
Nick